Submissions

Author Guidelines

There is no Article Processing Fee for papers submitted

Manuscripts are submitted

• In Russian language
• title, author's full name, organization/place of work, annotations and keywords should be in in Russian, Armenian and English
• the author is obliged to ensure in printed and electronic versions that the manuscript complies with the subject of the journal and provide the final version of the copyright
• in Microsoft Office Word (*.docx or *.doc)
• paper size: A4
• font: Times New Roman
• references are provided in accordance with generally accepted rules
• font size: 12, for abstracts and keywords: 10
• line spacing: 1.3, for footnotes: 1, indent: 1.5 cm

Volume of Articles 

not more than 8000 characters (0,5)

Title of Articles 

• should outline general scope of the article and should not be longer than 8 words
• be in upper case
• be in 12 font size

Information about the author(s)

• The name, surname and brief information about the author/authors of the manuscript
• The full name and postal address of each author’s workplace, organization
• The author’s position, title, academic degree
• contact information – author’s email and phone number
• The first letters of the author's name and surname should be full and in uppercase

Abstract

• should not exceed 200 words
• should reflect the main content of the article and be informative
• should not contain generic/special words and phrases
• should give a short summary of the research and findings
• should reflect the main content of the article indicating the topic, purpose, research findings and conclusions
• information in the title should not be duplicated or repeated in the abstract
• the abstract should provide a good perspec­tive on the subject matter and final message of the article

Introduction should

• provide specific background information about the article in a particular field of science, its philosophy and methodology;
• reflect current problems and issues in the field;
• specify research objectives

Conclusions

• should be clear and succinct

Keywords (Բանալի բառեր, ключевые слова)

• not more than ten words and phrases
• should be separated by commas

References

Reference citations should comply with APA referencing style (author, year, page). For example, [Romanov 2008, 25], [Gourdin, 1999, 21-22].

Guidelines for Reference List

In Bibliography, the list should be presented into two versions - in the original language and with the transliteration of the Armenian and Russian literature into the Latin script, using the rules of the British Standards Institution (BSI). Transliteration is done using an automatic transliteration model (for example, http://transliteration.pro/bsi) e.g.

• Бройтман С.Н. Историческая поэтика. М.: Российский государственный гуманитарный университет, 2001. 320 с.
• Broitman S.N. Istoricheskaia poetika. Moscow: Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet, 2001. 320 p.

Guides for monograph by one author

• Lotman Y.M. Inside the Thinking Worlds. Man is Text, Semiosphere is History. — M.: "Languages of Russian Culture", 1996. and 464 p.

Guides for monograph by two or more authors:

• Sinyachkin V.P., Bragina M.A., Dronov V.V. and others. Linguistic and Cultural Aspects of the Formation of Linguistic Consciousness among Foreign Students in the Process of Studying Russian Language. / Filippov, V.M.   RUDN, 2008

Books and monographs (collective) published under (general) editorship

• Ethnicity. Culture. Statehood. Problems of Ethnic Federalism in the XXI Century: monograph. / Salikova M. S. Ekaterinburg: UMC-UPI, 2014. 184 p.

Articles in journals

• Sternin I.A. Language and National Consciousness // Logos. 2005. No. 4(49). pp. 156–171
• Esadzhanyan B.M., Amirkhanyan A.M. Role and Place of Philological Disciplines in in Postgraduate Education of Teachers of Russian Language and Literature // Russian language in Armenia. 2011. No. 2 (63). pp. 3-11

Chapters in books

• Amirkhanyan M.D., Amirkhanyan A.M. Lermontov amongst Armenian relatives // Amirkhanyan M.D., Amirkhanyan A.M. Lermontov and the Armenian World. Yerevan: Lusabats Publishing House, 2014. 118 p. - P. 10-75.

Internet Sources

Texts of the articles submitted in a website usually vary from their printed versions, that is why in case of citing the latest website ver­sions, it is necessary to indicate the approp­riate electronic address, moreover, the cita­tion of the printed version is not accepted.

Description of the Internet source in the reference list: author/authors (surname, initials); the title of the material, year of publication // URL: full (final) address of the site where the material is posted, in brackets: (date of access: DD.MM.YYYY):

• Samoilov D.V. On the Translation of a Medical Text. M., 2006// URL: http://samlib.ru/w/wagapow_a_s/ medicaldoc-1.shtml (date of access: 12.12.2012)
• Amirkhanyan A. M. The Cultural-Historical and Biographical Context of Pushkin's Stanza About "Erivan Carpets // Heritage of the Ages. 2019. № 2. P. 45-52 // URL: http://heritage-magazine.com/index.php/HC/issue/view/2/2 (date of access: 5.07.2020)

Tables and Graphs

If the manuscript contains non-alphabetic characters (for example, logical formulas, diagrams, etc.), it is required

• The PDF version of the text should be submitted for verification
• All figures (charts, diagrams and drawings) and photographic images should be of clear quality, numbered consecutively with arabic numerals and submitted electronically
• Figures and images should be submitted in high-quality resolution
• all images should be submitted as separate files
• graphs, drawings, diagrams should be submitted in EXCEL or EPS format

Types of structuring articles

Publication of archival materials and translation sources

The manuscript must include complete description of the archival and/or publication materials based on which the translation has been done.

• A brief prologue (1-3 pages, approximately 4000 characters) may precede the publication prologue may precede the publication. Long pro­logues are regarded articles and should be written under separate titles
• If the source contains references, they are presented as a part of the body text and are numbered in sequential order and pre­cede the body text source
• The Publisher or translator may provide references about the publishing source at the end of the body text.
• With the help of references the author may present translations of foreign words, explanations of abbrevia­tions, etc. in the source text, enclosing in square brackets
• It is advisable to choose up to 40.000-charac­ter source for materials in the perio­dical. In case of a large source, it is ne­cessary to shorten (select the number) for preparing ma­terials for the periodical
• Translations and archival sources should have enough comments and full introductions, ot­herwise they may not be viewed as scien­tific publications and be submitted for publication

Essays submitted to various symposiums/conferences and scientific events

• should contain information about event organizers, venue, and time
• should contain participants’ name, surname, workplace and city (in brackets). In case of international sym­posiums, the name of the city and country is also provided
• should not have a title coinciding with the symposium projects or their final documents

Reviews and bibliographic reviews

• Argumentative notes, reviews
• Materials that are written in free style and do not meet the requirements for scientific papers are not accepted for publication. Such kind of works cannot be submitted in scientific reports as scientific publications.

Review format

An article review format submitted to the Editorial Board of the "Russian Language in Armenia" periodical of Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khachatur Abovyan.

Article title –

Peer review process

1. Put a "V" in the corresponding squares (1-7)
2. present "Special Notes" in writing

Material relevance
  a) the work has up-to-date content: V
  b) the work is partially relevant:       □
    c) The work does not contain anything new:  □
2. Material methodology
     a) the work stands out [among the others] for its clear methodology: V
     b) the work is poorly presented: □
     c) The work lacks methodology: □
3.  Material purpose
     a) The purpose corresponds to the result: V
     b) The purpose of the work is partially formulated: □
     c) The purpose of the work is not clearly defined: □
4. Conclusions
    a) The results of the work are evident: V
    b) The results of the work are not clear: □
    c) The results are not acceptable: □
5. Use of literature
     a) References and sources are adequate: V
     b) the author is partly familiar with bibliography and sources: □
     c) the author is not well aware of bibliography and sources: □
6. Wording and language
     a) wording is clear and concise: V
     b) wording needs reviewing: □
     c) wording is poor:  □
7. Overall evaluation of submitted manuscript
     a) The work is guaranteed for publication: V
     b) the work will be guaranteed for publication after partial changes (see p. 1 of "Special Notes"): □
     c) The work is not guaranteed for publication (see p. 1 of "Special Notes"): □

Special notes

Opinion summary about the submitted work. e.g: In the given article, the author has addressed a very important topic: the influence of formulaic expressions and phraseological units in speech which enhance the connotation in the text and sentence. The cited examples, which have been used for a long time are meant to facilitate the understanding of the language by foreign students and contribute to the development of oral speech, thereby forming conditions for a language environment.

• The author of the article studied the problem of translation and features of lexical units in professionally oriented texts, identified and analyzed the difficulties of a lexical and terminological nature, and also presented methods and techniques for translating problematic language units and interlingual correspondences․ (not more than 10 lines)  

  2) guidelines for authors (up to 5 lines, if available)

  3)  Additions to the bibliography (if available)

  4) Other observations (up to 5 lines, if available)

Reviewer’s name, surname and title_______________________________________________

Reviewer's workplace ____ lecturer ________________________________________________

Date of review, __2022______________________ signature_____________________________

P.S.

The editorial board of "Russian language in armenia" guarantees the anonymity of the reviewer

Important aspect of peer-review process

Attention!  Given the significance of the underlying principle of pluralism over scientific issues and freedom of speech, IPP reminds that the authors carry primary responsibility for the viewpoints introduced in their papers which may not always coincide with those of the Editorial Board. All articles undergo single-blind review and check for plagiarism at: https://www.quetext.com.